DREDGECAP
NASDAQ·Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
ULBI

ULTRALIFE CORP

ULTRALIFE CORP (ticker: ULBI) is an NASDAQ-listed miscellaneous electrical machinery, equipment & supplies company. DredgeCap's structured extraction of ULBI's SEC filings surfaces 7 active risk signals, including 6 late-filing signals, and 1 auditor-change signal. ULBI reported $47.45M in revenue and -$451K for the period ending 2026-03-31, with operating cash flow of $2.26M. Cash and equivalents stood at $8.89M (up 2% year-over-year). Total assets of $220.63M exceed total liabilities of $90.89M. Each signal on this page is sourced verbatim from the underlying SEC filing. Use the tabs above to drill into auditor history, going-concern citations, dilution mechanics, cash runway, and the full risk-flag inventory.

ULBI Legal Proceedings

Full litigation history for ULTRALIFE CORP (ULBI) — every legal proceeding disclosed in SEC filings plus matched federal-court dockets. 7 distinct proceedings surfaced across 0 reviewed periodic filings. Each excerpt below is quoted verbatim from the source — DredgeCap does not paraphrase or characterize.

Federal Court Dockets — External Match (7)

Cases matched from CourtListener / RECAP federal docket index by company name. Materiality has not been confirmed against SEC disclosures; match confidence is shown per case.

Docket filed 2024-11-13· Match confidence: high
Nordsense Inc. v. Ultralife Corporation — Case No. 6:24-cv-06659 (nywd, filed 2024-11-13). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Docket filed 2022-02-25· Match confidence: high
Celebration IP LLC v. Ultralife Corporation — Case No. 1:22-cv-00248 (ded, filed 2022-02-25). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Docket filed 2013-04-30· Match confidence: high
Ultralife Corporation v. Targus Group International, Inc. — Case No. 6:13-cv-06225 (nywd, filed 2013-04-30). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Docket filed 2008-11-20· Match confidence: medium
Federal Trade Commission v. Ultralife Fitness, Inc — Case No. 2:08-cv-07655 (cacd, filed 2008-11-20). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: medium. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Docket filed 2005-10-17· Match confidence: medium
Tanner v. Ultralife Batteries, Inc. — Case No. 6:05-cv-06544 (nywd, filed 2005-10-17). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: medium. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Docket filed 1998-08-03· Match confidence: medium
CASTLEROCK MANAGEMENT LTD v. ULTRALIFE BATTERIES — Case No. 2:98-cv-03619 (njd, filed 1998-08-03). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: medium. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Docket filed 1997-06-06· Match confidence: medium
Eveready Battery Co v. Ultralife Batteries — Case No. 1:97-cv-01558 (ohnd, filed 1997-06-06). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: medium. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Disclosure: Legal proceedings described above may contain allegations that have not been proven. Filings often disclose claims that are later dismissed, settled, or resolved without admission of wrongdoing. DredgeCap surfaces ULBI’s own disclosure language and matched public court records for investor-risk research only — no paraphrasing, no AI summarization, no implied severity. This is not legal advice or investment advice. Coverage notes: Coverage reflects only filings cached by DredgeCap; older filings or those not yet ingested may not appear. Disclosures may contain allegations that were subsequently dismissed, settled, or resolved without admission of wrongdoing. External docket records (CourtListener / RECAP) are matched by company-name; coverage is not exhaustive and name matches may produce false positives that require verification.