Wray v. RTX Corporation — Case No. 3:25-cv-00656 (ncwd, filed 2025-08-29). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
← RTX OverviewDocket filed 2025-08-29· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2024-10-29· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2024-10-24· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2024-10-21· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2023-08-03· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2021-12-14· Match confidence: high
RTX Legal Proceedings
Full litigation history for RTX Corp (RTX) — every legal proceeding disclosed in SEC filings plus matched federal-court dockets. 6 distinct proceedings surfaced across 10 reviewed periodic filings. Each excerpt below is quoted verbatim from the source — DredgeCap does not paraphrase or characterize.
Federal Court Dockets — External Match (6)
Cases matched from CourtListener / RECAP federal docket index by company name. Materiality has not been confirmed against SEC disclosures; match confidence is shown per case.
Werda v. RTX Corporation — Case No. 1:24-cv-11140 (ilnd, filed 2024-10-29). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Rogers v. RTX Corporation — Case No. 4:24-cv-00519 (azd, filed 2024-10-24). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Goldstein v. RTX Corporation — Case No. 1:24-cv-01169 (ded, filed 2024-10-21). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Peneycad v. RTX Corporation — Case No. 3:23-cv-01035 (ctd, filed 2023-08-03). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Borozny v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division — Case No. 3:21-cv-01657 (ctd, filed 2021-12-14). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Disclosure: Legal proceedings described above may contain allegations that have not been proven. Filings often disclose claims that are later dismissed, settled, or resolved without admission of wrongdoing. DredgeCap surfaces RTX’s own disclosure language and matched public court records for investor-risk research only — no paraphrasing, no AI summarization, no implied severity. This is not legal advice or investment advice. Coverage notes: Coverage reflects only filings cached by DredgeCap; older filings or those not yet ingested may not appear. Disclosures may contain allegations that were subsequently dismissed, settled, or resolved without admission of wrongdoing. External docket records (CourtListener / RECAP) are matched by company-name; coverage is not exhaustive and name matches may produce false positives that require verification.