Buxbaum v. Walt Disney Co. — Case No. 1:25-cv-02339 (nysd, filed 2025-03-20). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
← DIS OverviewDocket filed 2025-03-20· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2024-02-06· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2020-02-25· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2019-07-02· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2018-06-01· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2015-11-10· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2010-11-09· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2007-05-11· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2005-09-20· Match confidence: high Docket filed 2002-02-22· Match confidence: high Docket filed 1996-11-06· Match confidence: high
DIS Legal Proceedings
Full litigation history for Walt Disney Co (DIS) — every legal proceeding disclosed in SEC filings plus matched federal-court dockets. 11 distinct proceedings surfaced across 10 reviewed periodic filings. Each excerpt below is quoted verbatim from the source — DredgeCap does not paraphrase or characterize.
Federal Court Dockets — External Match (11)
Cases matched from CourtListener / RECAP federal docket index by company name. Materiality has not been confirmed against SEC disclosures; match confidence is shown per case.
Gina Carano v. The Walt Disney Company — Case No. 2:24-cv-01009 (cacd, filed 2024-02-06). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Lanham v. Walt Disney Co. and Affliates — Case No. 3:20-cv-00080 (tned, filed 2020-02-25). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
MIHALKO v. THE WALT DISNEY CO. — Case No. 2:19-cv-00789 (pawd, filed 2019-07-02). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Malki v. The Walt Disney Company — Case No. 6:18-cv-00848 (flmd, filed 2018-06-01). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Royce Mathew v. The Walt Disney Co. — Case No. 15-56726 (ca9, filed 2015-11-10). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
DOE v. Walt Disney Co. — Case No. 3:10-cv-00703 (nvd, filed 2010-11-09). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Nicholaw v. Walt Disney Co. — Case No. 3:07-cv-02522 (cand, filed 2007-05-11). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Franz A Wakefield v. Walt Disney Co — Case No. 2:05-cv-06857 (cacd, filed 2005-09-20). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
World Impressions v. Walt Disney Co — Case No. 1:02-cv-01318 (ilnd, filed 2002-02-22). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Walt Disney Co Inc v. Miller — Case No. 1:96-cv-02566 (cod, filed 1996-11-06). Source: CourtListener public docket index. Match confidence: high. Materiality and substance have not been confirmed against SEC disclosures.
Disclosure: Legal proceedings described above may contain allegations that have not been proven. Filings often disclose claims that are later dismissed, settled, or resolved without admission of wrongdoing. DredgeCap surfaces DIS’s own disclosure language and matched public court records for investor-risk research only — no paraphrasing, no AI summarization, no implied severity. This is not legal advice or investment advice. Coverage notes: Coverage reflects only filings cached by DredgeCap; older filings or those not yet ingested may not appear. Disclosures may contain allegations that were subsequently dismissed, settled, or resolved without admission of wrongdoing. External docket records (CourtListener / RECAP) are matched by company-name; coverage is not exhaustive and name matches may produce false positives that require verification.